Skip to main content
· 7/19/1990

Heverly v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 578 A.2d 575
  • 134 Pa. Commw. 110
  • 1990 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding claimant's presence not required for the purposes of Section 301(c)(1) of the Act after leaving work for the day and sustaining an injury upon returning later to retrieve her eyeglasses
  • injury sustained when employee returned to employer’s premises after completion of employment duties to retrieve eyeglasses not compensable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craig, McGinley, Barbieri, Doyle, Colins, Palladino, Smith, Pellegrini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.