Heusser v. Hale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing injunction to relist plaintiff’s business on the city’s programming as personal in nature
• applying the same test to the speech of a contracted towing company
• a public employee’s filing of a lawsuit against his employer “d[oes] not automatically constitute protected speech,” but must “implicate[ ] matters of public concern”
• not allowing claim for malice- based selective enforcement in public employment context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).