Heth's v. Wooldridge's

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to permit material oral modifications of contracts required to be in writing “presents... the very mischiefs which the Statute meant to prevent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lindsay v. McEnearney Associates, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2000-06-09· cited 26×
• Powell v. Bank of America, N.A.
  S.D. West Virginia· 2012-02-02· cited 9×
• Paul Bruce, Inc. v. Gemini Asset Managers
  Fairfax County Circuit Court· 1995-01-17· cited 1×
• 11401 Corp. v. Moses & Associates
  Chesterfield County Circuit Court· 1988-10-18

Other cases named Heth's v. Wooldridge's

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Heth's v. Wooldridge's
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1828-12-17
• Heth's v. Wooldridge's
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1828-12-17
• Heth's v. Wooldridge's
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1828-12-17