Heston v. Ousler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that defendant’s dock encroached upon plaintiffs’ common law littoral property rights when it was located at angle so as to be directly in front of plaintiffs’ waterfront
• upholding master’s finding that defendants’ dock constituted a nuisance where the dock completely obscured the plaintiffs’ view of the water and “created a safety hazard for the plaintiffs when swimming within their own water space”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).