Hester Industries, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Tyson Foods, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a district court's findings of fact should only be overturned if they are clearly erroneous
• explaining that Rule 41(a)(2) does not apply to circumstances where the plaintiff can secure consent to a stipulated dismissal
• explaining that Rule 41(a)(2) does not apply to circumstances where the plaintiff can secure consent to a stipulated dismissal
• explaining that Rule 41(a)(2) does not apply to circumstances where the plaintiff can secure consent to a stipulated dismissal
• explaining that “dismissal was effectuated by [Rule 41(a)(1)(H)] stipulation of the parties”
• explaining that “dismissal was effectuated by [Rule 41(a)(1)(h)] stipulation of the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).