· 10/7/2013
Hessmer v. Colson
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 132
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 93
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3182
- 571 U.S. 855
- 2013 WL 2392885
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5619
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting an argument that “Connecticut is prohibited from referencing national market share when it assesses recycling fees because doing so regulates—thereby placing a burden on—interstate commerce.”
- rejecting an argument that “Connecticut 24 is prohibited from referencing national market share when it assesses recycling fees because doing so regulates—thereby placing a burden on—interstate commerce.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.