Skip to main content

Hessler, Inc. v. Farrell

Citations

  • 260 A.2d 701
  • 1969 Del. LEXIS 224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “manifest purpose of all Rule 59 motions is to afford the Trial Court an opportunity to correct errors”
  • “manifest purpose of all Rule 59 motions is to afford the Trial Court an opportunity to correct errors”
  • “manifest purpose of all Rule 59 motions is to afford the Trial Court an opportunity to correct errors”
  • “manifest purpose of all Rule 59 motions is to afford the Trial Court an opportunity to correct errors”
  • “manifest purpose of all Rule 59 motions is to afford the Trial Court an opportunity to correct errors”
  • “manifest purpose of all Rule 59 motions is to afford the Trial Court an opportunity to correct errors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolcott, Carey, Herrmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hessler, Inc. v. Farrell

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.