Skip to main content
· 12/7/1910

Hesselgrave v. Ginnett

Citations

  • 61 Wash. 87
  • 111 P. 1064
  • 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1288

Syllabus

<p>Principal and Agent — Compensation—Evidence—Sufficiency. In an action for the services of an agent, the defense that the agent was to build bunkers costing $7,000, for the unloading of scows, is not made out where the testimony was vague, the agent could have been discharged at any time, and appears to have been discharged for other reasons.</p>

Judges: Rudkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.