Ninth Circuit· 3/10/2010
Hesse v. Sprint Corp.
Citations
- 598 F.3d 581
- 49 Communications Reg. (P&F) 1049
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5017
- 2010 WL 790340
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “superficial similarity” is insufficient to meet the identical factual predicate test
- allowing limited collateral review of the adequacy of representation where the class action court did not make sufficient findings on the issue
- acknowledging the general rule as well as exception for “constitutionally infirm” state-court judgments
- “The superficial similarity between the two class actions is insufficient to justify the release of the later claims by the settlement of the former.”
- “Even apart from 20 || [inadequate representation], a settlement agreement’s bare assertion that a party will 21 |
- “[The claim] is based on a different set of operative 7 facts and is not merely an alternative remedy or theory of recovery.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarcón, Kleinfeld, Clifton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Skilstaf, Inc. v. Cvs Caremark Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2012-02-09· cited 183×
- Ministry of Defense & Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Cubic Defense Systems, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2011-12-15· cited 85×
- Campbell v. Facebook, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2020-03-03· cited 84×
- Trishan Air, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceNinth Circuit· 2011-02-16· cited 82×
- Denver Homeless Out Loud v. Denver, ColoradoTenth Circuit· 2022-05-03· cited 59×
- Nen Thio v. Genji, LLCN.D. California· 2014-08-07· cited 48×
- Carlin v. DairyAmerica, Inc.E.D. California· 2019-05-08· cited 34×
- Lisa Kim v. Tinder, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2023-12-05· cited 29×
- McNeary-Calloway v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.N.D. California· 2012-03-26· cited 26×
- Cesar Moreno v. Utiliquest, LLCNinth Circuit· 2022-03-18· cited 20×
- Agne v. Papa John's International, Inc.W.D. Washington· 2012-11-09· cited 20×
- Nunez v. Bae Sys. San Diego Ship Repair Inc.S.D. California· 2017-11-14· cited 7×
- Shields v. Walt Disney Parks & Resorts US, Inc.C.D. California· 2011-06-29· cited 7×
- Hoffman v. Blattner Energy, Inc.C.D. California· 2016-06-15· cited 6×
- Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-11-21· cited 4×
- Rader v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc.D. Nevada· 2011-10-05· cited 4×
- Aichele v. City of Los AngelesC.D. California· 2013-08-26· cited 3×
- Chan Healthcare Group v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-12-11
- Chan Healthcare Grp. v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court· 2018-12-13
- Amaro v. Anaheim Arena ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-09-28
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court· 1982-05-17· cited 2,347×
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court· 1985-06-26· cited 1,691×
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1998-06-09· cited 1,381×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court· 1996-02-27· cited 497×
- Class v. City of SeattleNinth Circuit· 1992-02-04· cited 325×
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesNinth Circuit· 2009-01-29· cited 230×
- Howard v. America Online Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2000-03-29· cited 204×
- Honeycutt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-07-10· cited 115×
- Williams v. Boeing Co.Ninth Circuit· 2008-02-27· cited 111×
- Intercontinental Travel Marketing, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Gateway National BankNinth Circuit· 1994-12-28· cited 92×
- Brown v. Ticor Title Insurance CompanyFirst Circuit· 1992-12-28· cited 70×
- Epstein v. MCA, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1999-06-07· cited 55×
- Epstein v. MCA, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1995-02-27· cited 49×
- United States v. MilnerNinth Circuit· 2009-10-09· cited 46×
- Peck v. Cingular Wireless, LLCNinth Circuit· 2008-08-07· cited 46×
- Chamberlain v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-07-14· cited 14×
- Anderson v. Employers Mutual Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-06-09· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.