Skip to main content
· 3/4/1994

Hess v. St. Francis Regional Medical Center

Citations

  • 869 P.2d 598
  • 254 Kan. 715
  • 1994 Kan. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a notice of appeal need not be too technical or detailed and should be broadly construed
  • recognizing that a notice of appeal need not be too technical or detailed and should be broadly construed
  • \It is a fundamental proposition of Kansas appellate procedure that an appellate court obtains jurisdiction over the rulings identified in the notice of appeal.\ [Emphasis added.]
  • “It is a fundamental proposition of Kansas appellate procedure that an appellate court obtains jurisdiction over the rulings identified in the notice of appeal.” [Emphasis added.]
  • appeal from “portions of the jury verdict and the judgment entered by the court” sufficient to preserve challenges to comparative fault and collateral source benefits determinations
  • \[A]n appellate court only obtains jurisdiction over the rulings identified in the notice of appeal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett, Six, McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.