Skip to main content

Hess v. Hess

Citations

  • 104 Kan. 207
  • 178 P. 750
  • 1919 Kan. LEXIS 225

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE. COURT.</p> <p>1. Landlord and Tenant — Wrongful Disposition of Bents — Injunction — Receiver Appointed — No Reversible Error. Landlords procured an injunction enjoining their tenant from removing, selling, or disposing of the landlords’ share of the crop. A receiver was appointed to take charge of the crop, and- he afterward sold it. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs, and the receiver was ordered to turn the money over to them. Held, that the judgment should not be reversed, although the landlords had the right to attach, to sue in replevin, or to sue for damages.</p> <p>2. Same — Sufficient Petition. The petition, summarized in the opinion, stated a cause of action.</p> <p>8. Same — Injunction—Jurisdiction of Court. A district court has jurisdiction to grant an injunction, and although, it may be erroneously granted, yet the final judgment, if it is one that should be rendered, will not be reversed because of the injunction.</p>

Judges: Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.