Hess v. Conway
Citations
- 92 Kan. 787
- 142 P. 253
- 4 A.L.R. 1580
- 1914 Kan. LEXIS 323
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Judicial Sale — Certificate of Purchase — Redemption—Knowledge by Attorney Imputed to His Principal. Knowledge by an attorney for the holder of a certificate of purchase of land sold at a judicial sale of a contract which he had negotiated between the purchaser and the landowner relating to redemption, and of the payment of money, which came into his hands, by way of redemption according to the contract, will be imputed to an assignee of the certificate who soon afterward employed the same attorney to represent his interests, when the knowledge was present in the mind of the attorney throughout his second employment.</p> <p>2. Same — Knowledge of Agent Imputed to Principal. Knowledge that the attorney had obtained possession of the redemption money paid under the contract, imparted to an agent of the assignee who had active charge of his principal’s interests as a holder of the certificate, will be imputed to the principal.</p> <p>3. Same — Holder of Certificate of Purchase — Estoppel to Deny Redemption Has Been Effected. With knowledge of the contract and of the possession by his attorney of the money paid for redemption, the assignee of the certificate acquiesced and permitted the landowner to complete redemption by paying to the clerk of the district court the remainder of the sum necessary for that purpose. Held, after the period of redemption expired the holder of the certificate was estopped to deny that redemption had been effected.</p> <p>4. Same — Money Paid Attorney for Redemption Rightfully Ordered Returned to Court. The portion of the redemption money obtained by the attorney not having been paid to the holder of the certificate, it belonged in the custody of the clerk of the district court and the court had .summary jurisdiction to compel the attorney to restore to the treasury of the court the money which he had diverted.</p> <p>5. Same — Unprofessional Conduct of Attorney — Power of Court to Discipline. The facts we
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- agency must be in context of case
- agency must be in context of case
- \Notice to an agent or attorney is notice to his principal or client in regard to the matter in which he is engaged. . . . Notice to the attorney which will bind the client must be notice in the particular transaction in which the client has employed him.\ (internal quotations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chanute Production Credit Ass'n v. Schicke (In Re Schicke)Tenth Circuit· 2003-03-17· cited 51×
- Citizens Bank v. Citizens & So. BankSupreme Court of Georgia· 1925-03-11· cited 33×
- Akers v. AkersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1951-02-02· cited 24×
- Underwood v. FoshaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1915-07-10· cited 21×
- Sawtelle v. Cosden Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1929-05-04· cited 18×
- Alexander v. RussoCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1977-08-12· cited 16×
- Loomis v. National Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1916-12-09· cited 11×
- Overlander v. OverlanderSupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-02-08· cited 9×
- Bankers Mortgage Co. v. DoleSupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-04-05· cited 9×
- Theis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1945-07-07· cited 8×
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1922-04-07· cited 8×
- Humphrey v. Wyandt Mortgage & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1916-06-10· cited 2×
- Lawrence National Bank v. Edmonds (In re Edmonds)D. Kansas· 1989-11-22· cited 2×
- Lang v. AldredCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1935-04-08· cited 1×
- Stout v. KanEquip, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2024-06-28· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.