Skip to main content
· 9/28/1882

Hesing v. Attorney General

Citations

  • 104 Ill. 292
  • 1882 Ill. LEXIS 299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a water company is not “an insurer of any individual citizen and tax-payer against loss by fire” because “the consideration for [supplying water] is totally inadequate upon which to presume that any such duty was contemplated by the parties”
  • a water company is not ―an insurer of any individual citizen and tax-payer against loss by fire‖ because ―the consideration for [supplying water] is totally inadequate upon which to presume that any such duty was contemplated by the parties‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scholfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.