Hescock v. ZON. BD. OF APP. OF TOWN OF STONINGTON

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing portions of transcript of both “the public hearing” and “the board’s decision-making process”
• fifty-three foot variance justified by decrease in noncompliance with 100 foot setback requirement and elimination of noncompliance with all remaining flood zone regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).