Herzog v. Boykin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plaintiff was required to “fly the flag” because “permissive use of the land . . . could not ripen into a prescriptive use without a distinct and positive assertion of a right hostile to the owner”
• “Sufficient notice of a hostile and adverse use has been defined as acts of possession which ‘fly the flag.’”
• applying prescriptive easement principles to adverse 14 possession
• applying prescriptive easement principles to adverse possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).