Hertz v. Woodbury County, Iowa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that a finding of constructive knowledge is possible where plaintiffs “were discouraged from submitting overtime slips or [where] submitted slips went unpaid”
• stating that the AMWA appears to impose the same overtime requirements as the FLSA
• discussing appropriateness of jury instruction about whether employer should have known, based on nonpayroll records, that employees were working during 30 commutes and meal breaks
• upholding jury verdict of no actual knowledge of overtime work and no constructive knowledge because no evidence that hours of field officers were being under-reported or that officers were discouraged from using the overtime system
• upholding jury verdict of no actual knowledge of overtime work and no constructive knowledge because no evidence that hours of field officers were being under-reported or that officers were discouraged from using the overtime system
• “There is no indication here that the officers were discouraged from submitting overtime slips or that submitted slips went unpaid.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).