Tenth Circuit· 8/11/2009
Hertz v. Luzenac Group
Citations
- 576 F.3d 1103
- 2009 WL 2437833
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a customer list may be a trade secret where “it is the end result of a long process of culling the relevant information from lengthy and diverse sources, even if. the original sources are publicly available”
- holding that a customer list may be a trade secret where “it is the end result of a long process of culling the relevant information from lengthy and diverse sources, even if the original sources are publicly available”
- holding that a customer list may be a trade secret where “it is the end result of a long process of culling the relevant information from lengthy and diverse sources, even if the original sources are publicly available”
- holding that a customer list may be a trade secret where “it is the end result of a long process of culling the relevant information from lengthy and diverse sources, even if the original sources are publicly available”
- reviewing denial of leave to amend -4- complaint for abuse of discretion
- “We review the dismissal of these claims on a motion for summary judgment de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Holloway, Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wilkerson v. ShinsekiTenth Circuit· 2010-06-02· cited 309×
- United States v. NosalNinth Circuit· 2016-07-05· cited 64×
- McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2015-11-03· cited 58×
- Shields v. Professional Bureau of Collections of MarylandTenth Circuit· 2022-12-16· cited 40×
- Storagecraft Technology Corp. v. KirbyTenth Circuit· 2014-03-11· cited 24×
- Mintz v. Accident & Injury Medical Specialists, PCColorado Court of Appeals· 2010-11-10· cited 22×
- Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc. v. GaubatzDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-06· cited 20×
- Purzel Video GmbH v. SmoakD. Colorado· 2014-01-06· cited 15×
- Double Eagle Alloys v. HooperTenth Circuit· 2025-04-22· cited 14×
- Purzel Video Gmbh v. St. PierreD. Colorado· 2014-01-06· cited 13×
- United States v. David NosalNinth Circuit· 2016-07-05· cited 12×
- Sisneros v. FisherD. New Mexico· 2010-01-13· cited 9×
- Electrology Laboratory, Inc. v. KunzeD. Colorado· 2016-03-14· cited 7×
- SGS Acquisition Co. v. LinsleyD. Colorado· 2018-09-30· cited 7×
- Gustafson v. American Family Mutual InsuranceD. Colorado· 2012-10-05· cited 6×
- Eller v. National Football League Players Ass'nEighth Circuit· 2013-09-23· cited 5×
- Branta, LLC v. Newfield Prod. Co.D. Colorado· 2018-04-12· cited 2×
- Christou v. Beatport, LLCD. Colorado· 2012-03-14· cited 2×
- Integrity Medical Management, LLC v. Surgical Center at Premier, LLCD. Colorado· 2017-01-30· cited 1×
- United States v. David NosalNinth Circuit· 2016-12-08
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
- Amoco Oil Co. v. ErvinSupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-01-16· cited 844×
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesTenth Circuit· 1999-01-25· cited 832×
- Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. MuleiSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-03-20· cited 677×
- Jenkins v. WoodTenth Circuit· 1996-04-16· cited 450×
- James H. Moore & Associates Realty, Inc. v. Arrowhead at Vail, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-08-25· cited 371×
- Grossman v. Novell, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1997-08-08· cited 259×
- Walker v. Van LaninghamColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-09-07· cited 214×
- Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado· 1978-04-17· cited 176×
- Hertz v. Luzenac America, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2004-05-28· cited 141×
- Fields v. Oklahoma State PenitentiaryTenth Circuit· 2007-12-28· cited 139×
- Seamons v. SnowTenth Circuit· 2000-03-20· cited 125×
- Krystkowiak v. W.O. Brisben Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2004-05-24· cited 74×
- Powell Products, Inc. v. MarksD. Colorado· 1996-12-17· cited 48×
- Rivendell Forest Products, Ltd. v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation and Timothy L. CornwellTenth Circuit· 1994-08-01· cited 44×
- Colorado Supply Co., Inc. v. StewartColorado Court of Appeals· 1990-08-30· cited 42×
- Klein v. GrynbergTenth Circuit· 1995-02-16· cited 34×
- MDM Group Associates, Inc. v. CX Reinsurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2007-02-22· cited 32×
- Lauren Corp. v. Century Geophysical Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1998-01-22· cited 28×
- Ovation Plumbing, Inc. v. FurtonColorado Court of Appeals· 2001-09-06· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.