Hertz v. Hertz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing trial court’s judgment that New York’s grandparent visitation statute was unconstitutional and asserting that “Troxel does not mandate a finding that [grandparent visitation statute] is unconstitutional per se”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• E.S. v. P.D.
  New York Court of Appeals· 2007-02-15· cited 102×
• Conover v. Conover
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-07· cited 30×
• In the Matter of Es v. Pd
  New York Court of Appeals· 2007-02-15· cited 4×
• Keenan R. v. Julie L.
  New York Family Court· 2004-03-25· cited 2×
• Malinowski v. Farnam
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2002-08-27· cited 2×
• E.S. v. P.D.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-03-28· cited 1×
• Rachel S. v. Annette R.
  NYC Family Court· 2003-07-17· cited 1×
• Matter of Keenan R. v. Julie L.
  NYC Family Court· 2004-03-25

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Troxel v. Granville
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
• United States v. Salerno
  Supreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 5,104×
• Van Berkel v. Power
  New York Court of Appeals· 1965-07-09· cited 160×
• Morgan v. Grzesik
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-11-09· cited 22×
• Coulter v. Barber
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-10-12· cited 15×
• Fitzpatrick v. Youngs
  NYC Family Court· 2000-11-02· cited 9×
• Smolen v. Smolen
  NYC Family Court· 2000-09-15· cited 7×
• Hertz v. Hertz
  New York Supreme Court· 2000-10-26· cited 4×