Hertz Corp. v. McCray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “any person who is familiar with the method of keeping the records and can identify them may lay the necessary foundation” for admission under the business records exception
• “appellant must show [error] by the record as harm cannot be established by unsupported assertions contained in trial briefs”
• “[A] case will not be reversed merely because error may have occurred. Appellant is required to show harm as well as error to prevail on appeal.”
• “[a] witness identifying business records under OCGA § 24-3-14 does not have to have personal knowledge of the correctness of the records or have made the entry [herself]”
• \Appellant is required to show harm as well as error to prevail on appeal[.]\
• “Appellant is required to show harm as well as error to prevail on appeal[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).