Hertz Corp. v. Home Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because excess liability coverage is entitled to broader exemptions and exclusions than primary coverage, a conspicuous and unambiguous DUI exclusion is enforceable therein
• stating that an excess policy may contain an exclusion for drunk driving whereas a primary policy is prohibited from containing such an exclusion
• stating that an excess policy may contain an exclusion for drunk driving whereas a primary policy is prohibited from containing such an exclusion
• excess liability insurance policy’s incorporation of prohibited use of the rental agreement was unambiguous and sufficiently clear to be enforceable
• “when a policy contains sufficiently clear language, it matters not that the insured 27 . . . failed to read it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).