Hertz Corp. v. Garrott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “we need not rule on the trial court’s interpretation and construction of Hertz’s statutory obligation to indemnify third-party claimants”
• exclusionary clause in Hertz rental agreement which voided the liability protection and insurance provisions based upon the prohibited use of the vehicle is void as against public policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).