Hershman v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “petitioner ha[d] a plain authority, nor are we aware of any, in which a litigant was allowed to collaterally attack another federal court’s judgment under Rule 60(d)(1). As discussed above, such use of Rule 60(d)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).