Hershel CLADY, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the contention that a validity study must include individuals who failed the challenged test
• upholding district court where plaintiffs \failed to demonstrate that the [district] court's finding of job relatedness was clearly erroneous\
• identifying factors to 6 || consider when dismissing action for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with court 7 || orders
• analyzing pass rates on written examination as a whole as “a discrete selection device”
• “[a]s a general principle, the greater the test’s adverse impact, the higher the correlation which will be required”
• adverse impact on Hispanics, based upon 22.1% difference in pass rates, and 73% adverse impact ratio

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).