Herrmann v. Cissna

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that trial court rulings that do not dismiss causes of action are not appealable until after the final judgment
• analyzing the legislative policy and statutory framework to determine whether the legislature intended actions by the insurance commissioner to be for the benefit of the general public
• analyzing the legislative policy and statutory framework to determine whether the legislature intended actions by the insurance commissioner to be for the benefit of the general public
• denial of a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment is not a final order
• \[T]he deterrent effect of such proceedings ... is a factor tending to benefit the public in general.\
• \The fact that the state may be exercising a right derived by assignment... is not determinative.... [It] arises out of statute ...[and] is not a purely derivative action.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).