Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegations of delay in order to benefit therefrom were insufficient
• stating court may look to circumstances of case and compare party’s performance in similar cases in determining whether party failed to exercise best efforts
• upholding denial of leave to amend where plaintiffs had already filed original complaint and two amended complaints
• affirming a district court’s denial of leave to amend after two amended 11 Case: 21-20435 Document: 00516905516 Page: 12 Date Filed: 09/22/2023 No. 21-20435 complaints
• finding plaintiffs need not be afforded another opportunity to amend their complaint where they had already been given two opportunities to amend
• affirming denial of leave to replead where plaintiff already had twice been given leave to amend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).