Herring v. Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \distinguishing\ its supreme court's decision in Worthy , 967 S.W. 2d at 376, cited above, and ruling that state law claims regarding pacemaker not preempted by MDA because defendant failed to show conflict between state and federal requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).