Herring v. Parkman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Rule 56(f) \requires from the party opposing the summary judgment motion an affidavit stating the reasons why he cannot present essential facts\
• affirming summary judgment in legal-liability action where plaintiffs do not satisfy Rule 56(f); affidavits challenged merits only; objection stated that there had not been adequate discovery and that summary judgment was premature
• affirming summary judgment in legal-liability action where plaintiffs did not satisfy Rule 56(f); affidavits challenged merits only; objection stated that there had not been adequate discovery and that summary judgment was premature
• \Rule 56(f) requires from the party opposing the summary judgment motion an affidavit stating the reasons why he cannot present essential facts.\
• \Rule 56(f) requires from the party opposing the summary judgment motion an affidavit stating the reasons why he cannot present essential facts.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).