Herrin v. Herrin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \It is reversible error for the District Court to insert into a contract language not put there by the parties.\
• “It is reversible error for the District Court to insert into a contract language not put there by the parties.”
• court will not rewrite unambiguous contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of Austin, Texas and Lower Colorado River Authority v. Decker Coal Company, a Joint Venture, Wytana, Inc. And Western Minerals, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-03-28· cited 41×
• Hauseman v. Koski
  Montana Supreme Court· 1993-08-03· cited 11×
• Barker v. Francis
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1987-08-13· cited 10×
• Kartes v. Kartes
  Montana Supreme Court· 1981-11-20· cited 4×
• In Re Marriage of Thompson
  Montana Supreme Court· 1984-02-09· cited 4×
• Hurtt v. Sch. Dist. No. 29 Big Ho
  Montana Supreme Court· 1986-08-01· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Seaboard Surety Co.
  D. Montana· 1938-06-22· cited 33×
• Williams v. INSURAMCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
  Montana Supreme Court· 1967-12-01· cited 25×
• Danielson v. Danielson
  Montana Supreme Court· 1977-02-18· cited 24×
• Watsabaugh & Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1939-08-31· cited 24×