· 3/15/1846
Herrick v. Johnson
Citations
- 52 Mass. 26
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to “express an opinion on whether, even if the right [to counsel] had not attached, the * * * testimony was nonetheless impermissible”
- in reviewing the denial of a motion for mistrial, attaching “little significance to defendant’s decision not to propose a curative instruction”
- “We will not find the denial of a mistrial to be an abuse of discretion unless the defendant was denied a fair trial.”
- in reviewing the denial of a motion for mistrial, attaching “little significance to defendant’s decision not to propose a curative instruction”
- “[I]t is the court, not defendant, that must decide whether to grant the motion, to cure the effect of inappropriate conduct or testimony by giving a proper instruction instead, or to do nothing at all.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
- “[I]t is the court, not defendant, that must decide whether to grant the motion, to cure the effect of inappropriate conduct or testimony by giving a proper instruction instead, or to do nothing at all.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilde
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.