Herrick v. General Reinsurance Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “generalized allegation of ‘harassment’ in the administrative charge” was “void of the specifics necessary to put [the defendant] on notice”
• stating that plaintiff must file a timely charge of discrimination with the EEOC and receive a right- to-sue letter before filing a federal lawsuit stemming from ADA violations
• finding no extreme and outrageous misconduct where an employee alleged discriminatory denial of a promotion, differential policy enforcement, unfavorable 13 transfers, harsher evaluation standards, and false accusations
• “At the very least Byington, even filing pro se, could have informed the investigative agency of whether the perpetrators were managers, co-workers, or any other individual.”
• “[T]here is no reference to age discrimination in the narrative[.]”
• noting exhaustion requirement applies to ADEA claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).