Skip to main content
· 12/13/2004

Herricane Graphics, Inc. v. Blinderman Construction Co.

Citations

  • 820 N.E.2d 619
  • 354 Ill. App. 3d 151
  • 289 Ill. Dec. 843
  • 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 1509

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court lacked the authority to vacate the arbitrator’s award
  • declining to overturn an arbitration award even though the arbitrator misinterpreted instruction provisions because the interpretation was “potentially reasonable”
  • noting de novo review was appropriate when only the court’s legal conclusions were at issue on appeal from order vacating an arbitration award
  • “[A] court must construe an [arbitration] award, if possible, so as to uphold its validity.”
  • “Any roofs or rooms not listed did not sustain loss and damage from these 2 events.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Byrne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.