· 12/13/2004
Herricane Graphics, Inc. v. Blinderman Construction Co.
Citations
- 820 N.E.2d 619
- 354 Ill. App. 3d 151
- 289 Ill. Dec. 843
- 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 1509
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court lacked the authority to vacate the arbitrator’s award
- declining to overturn an arbitration award even though the arbitrator misinterpreted instruction provisions because the interpretation was “potentially reasonable”
- noting de novo review was appropriate when only the court’s legal conclusions were at issue on appeal from order vacating an arbitration award
- “[A] court must construe an [arbitration] award, if possible, so as to uphold its validity.”
- “Any roofs or rooms not listed did not sustain loss and damage from these 2 events.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.