District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/23/2004
Herrera v. State
Citations
- 879 So. 2d 38
- 2004 WL 1392396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for mistrial where an immediate curative instruction sufficiently cured the objectionable statement
- holding that curative instruction was sufficient to cure any prejudicial effect of officer’s statement
- holding that curative instruction was sufficient to cure any prejudicial effect of officer’s statement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hazouri
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Conley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-05-20· cited 60×
- Marek v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-06-26· cited 20×
- Tannihill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-02· cited 18×
- Beltran v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-08· cited 6×
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-18· cited 5×
- Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.