Herrera v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding insured’s employee’s daughter was not covered under policy covering insured’s business vehicles because employee was not named insured
• declining to extend the definition of “insured” to employees of the corporation named as the insured, and thus declining uninsured motorist coverage under the corporation’s auto insurance policy for an employee’s daughter who was injured in an accident involving an employee’s vehicle
• no ambiguity because named insured stated in policy was corporation and named insured does not include employees
• “We decline to ... define a named corporate insured as including the employees [of that corporation].”
• defining Class I and Class II insureds
• defining Class I and Class II insureds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).