· 1/15/2002
Herrera v. CTS Corp.
Citations
- 183 F. Supp. 2d 921
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2265
- 2002 WL 126363
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying sham affidavit doctrine when plaintiff’s affidavit contradicted both his prior deposition testimony and statements made to federal government in Social Security Administration questionnaire
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Black
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.