Skip to main content
· 8/23/2006

Herr v. City of Chicago

Citations

  • 447 F. Supp. 2d 915
  • 18 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1144
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63280
  • 2006 WL 2460593

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning in dismissing a retaliation claim that “[c]hecking a box marked ‘retaliation,’ without providing any supporting facts, does not satisfy the requirement of filing a retaliation charge with the EEOC”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castillo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.