Heron v. Phoenix Mutual Fire Insurance
Citations
- 180 Pa. 257
- 36 A. 740
- 1897 Pa. LEXIS 914
Syllabus
<p>Insurance — Fire insurance — Covenants—Fireworks.</p> <p>A policy of fire insurance provided that the policy should be void “if the hazard be increased by any means within the control or knowledge of the insured .... or if ... . there be kept, used or allowed on the above described premises benzine, benzole, dynamite, ether, fireworks,” etc. In an action upon the policy it appeared that the insured, for the purpose of celebrating the 4th of July, bought a lot of assorted fireworks which were delivered at his residence, in which was the property insured, on the morning of the 3d of July, and were shortly afterwards with his knowledge and approbation placed in the parlor for use on the following evening. In some unexplained way they took fire on the afternoon of the same day, and caused the loss for which suit was brought. Held, that it was error to refuse binding instructions for defendant.</p>
Judges: Fell, Green, McCollum, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.