· 9/17/1971
Herold v. Computer Components International, Inc.
Citations
- 252 So. 2d 576
- 56 A.L.R. 3d 1101
- 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6036
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding trial court exceeded its proper discretion in dismissing case where plaintiff attempted to comply with order and sought to explain inability to do so
- Not entirely responsive answers are to be distinguished from refusal to comply with an order compelling a party to answer
- dismissal as a sanction “should be imposed only” where a violation has been committed with a “willful disregard of or gross indifference to an order of the court”
- “In the case where a party refuses to answer, a mere failure to comply with an order of the court compelling an answer may result in sanctions under Rule 1.380 and no willful disregard or deliberate intent to disobey is required to be shown.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.