Skip to main content
· 2/28/1995

Herndon v. Whitworth

Citations

  • 924 F. Supp. 1171
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21069
  • 1995 WL 859336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing that occasional missed doses of medication do not implicate the Constitution
  • administering wrong medication did not amount to deliberate indifference where the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the mistake was “so grossly incompetent, inadequate, or intolerable so as to shock the conscience or to be intolerable to fundamental fairness”
  • administering wrong medication did not amount to deliberate indifference where the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the mistake was “so grossly incompetent, inadequate, or intolerable so as to shock the conscience or to be intolerable to fundamental fairness”
  • occasional missed doses of medication do not implicate the Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horace T. Ward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.