· 2/28/1995
Herndon v. Whitworth
Citations
- 924 F. Supp. 1171
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21069
- 1995 WL 859336
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing that occasional missed doses of medication do not implicate the Constitution
- administering wrong medication did not amount to deliberate indifference where the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the mistake was “so grossly incompetent, inadequate, or intolerable so as to shock the conscience or to be intolerable to fundamental fairness”
- administering wrong medication did not amount to deliberate indifference where the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the mistake was “so grossly incompetent, inadequate, or intolerable so as to shock the conscience or to be intolerable to fundamental fairness”
- occasional missed doses of medication do not implicate the Constitution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horace T. Ward
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.