Skip to main content
· 2/9/2012

Hernandez v. Yellow Transp., Inc.

Citations

  • 670 F.3d 644
  • 2012 WL 400569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that coworker retaliatory harassment is not adverse employment action in Title VII context
  • concluding that three comments that were “plainly offensive to a Hispanic person” made over ten years were insufficient
  • holding that a plaintiff being called a racially derogatory term and seeing a poster or letter that was derogatory about Hispanics was not sufficient to support a hostile work environment claim
  • holding that a plaintiff being called a racially derogatory term and seeing a poster or letter that was derogatory about Hispanics was not sufficient to support a hostile work environment claim
  • noting that race discrimination and retaliation claims under all three statutes “are analyzed under the same standard”
  • explaining that this court may “affirm a district court on any basis established by the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clement, Southwick and Haynes, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.