Hernandez v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “dismissals for lack of Article III jurisdiction must be entered without prejudice”
• explaining that a district court must give a 6 plaintiff at least one chance to amend a deficient complaint unless there is a clear showing that 7 amendment would be futile
• explaining that a district court 8 | must give a plaintiff at least one chance to amend a deficient complaint unless there is a clear 9 | showing that amendment would be futile
• affirming denial of leave to amend on futility grounds due to lack of additional allegations
• “[D]ismissals for lack of Article III jurisdiction must be entered without prejudice because a court that lacks jurisdiction “is powerless to reach the merits.”
• “[D]ismissals for lack of Article III jurisdiction must be entered without prejudice because a court that lacks jurisdiction “is powerless to reach the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).