Hernandez v. Valley View Hospital Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an amendment did not relate back because it was “based on factual allegations that were new and discrete from the facts [the plaintiff] originally pled”
• noting that an affidavit on summary judgment cannot create a genuine issue of material fact when, without explanation, it contradicts prior testimony
• noting that an affidavit on summary judgment could not create a genuine issue of material fact when, without explanation, it contradicts prior testimony
• noting that an affidavit on summary judgment could not create a genuine issue of material fact when, without explanation, it contradicts prior testimony
• noting that a plaintiff “can use a substantial amount of arguably [national origin]-neutral harassment to bolster a smaller amount of [national origin]-based conduct”
• explaining that addi- tional discriminatory statements did not contradict the affiant’s deposition, where she testified that such statements were “many”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).