Skip to main content
· 6/20/2016

Hernandez v. Stolzenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3503(b.1)(1)(iv), (b.1)(2) violates the single-subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution
  • holding that 18 Pa.S. 6111.1 violates the ‘single subject rule' of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution
  • holding that 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3503(b.1)(1)(iv), (b.1)(2) violates the single-subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution
  • holding that 18 Pa.C.S. § 3503(b.1)(1)(iv), (b.1)(2) violates the single-subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution
  • holding that 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3503(b.1)(1)(iv), (b.1)(2) violates the single-subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution
  • holding those subsections violate single subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of Pennsylvania Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.