Hernandez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding insufficient corroborating evidence in part because “[n]o fingerprints or other identifying clues were found at the scene which would connect appellant with the offense”
• finding insufficient corroborating evidence in part because \[n]o fingerprints or other identifying clues were found at the scene which would connect appellant with the offense\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re L.G.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-04-22· cited 55×
• Hernandez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1982-07-28· cited 11×
• Robinson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1983-11-02· cited 7×
• Morrison v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-03-31· cited 5×
• In re M. L.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1980-06-18· cited 3×
• Cox v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1990-12-19· cited 2×
• Clifton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-20· cited 1×
• Matter of ML
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1980-06-18
• Matter of LG
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-04-22
• Bruce Hughes v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2010-03-25
• Hernandez v. Earney
  W.D. Texas· 1983-03-10

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reynolds v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-05-03· cited 98×
• Dalrymple v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1963-02-27· cited 35×
• Rogers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-12-09· cited 25×
• Deal v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-04-24· cited 16×