Skip to main content

Hernandez v. State

Citations

  • 171 S.W.3d 347
  • 2005 WL 1431424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence of prior drug transaction was permissible under 404(b) because evidence was necessary to establish relationship in order to prove intent
  • holding that evidence of prior drug transaction was permissible under 404(b) because evidence was necessary to establish relationship in order to prove intent
  • holding that the evidence was sufficient to convict appellant of capital murder under the law of parties when physically present at the commission of the offense and encouraged its commission by words or other agreement
  • explaining that an objection must alert the trial court to what specifically is being objected
  • explaining that an objection must alert the trial court to what specifically is being objected
  • explaining that an objection must alert the trial court to what specifically is being objected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wanda McKee Fowler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.