Hernandez v. Prizma, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing merits of plaintiff's argument that federal statute addressing homosexuality in the armed forces violated his right to equal protection
• \[M]aintaining effective armed forces is indisputably a compelling governmental purpose.\
• “Maintaining effective armed forces is indisputably a compelling governmental purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).