Hernandez v. Mead Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating 12 that the rule does not apply when the testimony by the Worker’s expert “is 13 contradicted, or subjected to reasonable doubt as to its truth or veracity, by legitimate 14 inferences drawn from the facts and circumstances of the case”
• “The question is not whether substantial evidence would have supported an opposite result; it is whether such evidence supports the result reached.”
• “Conflicts in the evidence, even in the 6 testimony of a single witness, present a fact question for the trial court to decide.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).