Hernandez v. Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing Troxel’s import as “limited” and “stand[ing] for the narrow proposition that Wash. Rev. Code § 26.10.160(3) (1994) is constitutionally infirm as applied in that case”
• describing Troxel’s import as “limited” and “standing] for the narrow proposition that Wash. Rev. Code § 26.10.160(3) (1994) is constitutionally infirm as applied in that case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Conover v. Conover
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-07· cited 30×
• State v. Calver
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2013-06-04· cited 6×
• Overholser (Taylor) v. Overholser
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2018-12-20· cited 5×
• State v. Nikolas Sherman
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-04-01· cited 3×
• In RE C.J.C. v. the State of Texas
  Texas Supreme Court· 2020-06-26

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Troxel v. Granville
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
• State v. Korsen
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2003-04-24· cited 65×
• Stockwell v. Stockwell
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1989-06-05· cited 48×
• American Falls Reservoir District No. 2 v. Idaho Department of Water Resources
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 45×
• State, Dept. of Health & Welfare v. Housel
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2004-04-28· cited 36×
• Allied Bail Bonds, Inc. v. County of Kootenai
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2011-07-08· cited 27×
• State v. Doe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-04-08· cited 27×
• Lochsa Falls, L.L.C. v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-04-07· cited 25×
• Leavitt v. Leavitt
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 21×
• Heiss v. Conti
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-12-30· cited 16×
• In Re Doe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-12-29· cited 15×
• Ewing v. Gordon
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1974-12-26· cited 15×