Hernandez v. Hammond Homes, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “knowledge of the risk of roofers’ falling and appellees’ failure to require fall- protection equipment is not evidence that Stroud and appellees actually exercised control over the manner in which Brito’s employees performed their work”
• “Strowd’s knowledge of the risk of roofers’ falling and his and appellees’ failure to require fall-protection equipment is not evidence that Strowd and appellees actually exercised control over the manner in which Brito’s employees performed their work.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).