First Circuit· 7/17/2013
Hernandez-Cuevas v. Taylor
Citations
- 723 F.3d 91
- 2013 WL 3742484
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 14469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that fabricated evidence is constitutionally unacceptable to establish probable cause
- requiring a showing of causation in Bivens actions
- magistrate’s finding of probable cause creates a “causation problem”
- “As to the elements of such a [Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution] claim, we join those four circuits that have adopted a purely constitutional approach, holding that a plaintiff may bring a suit under § 1983 (or Bivens) if he can establish that: the defendant (1
- requiring a showing of causation in Bivens actions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, Stahl, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Manuel v. City of JolietSupreme Court· 2017-03-21· cited 1,069×
- Thompson v. ClarkSupreme Court· 2022-04-04· cited 766×
- Louis Bianchi v. Thomas McQueenSeventh Circuit· 2016-03-29· cited 171×
- Julian v. HannaSeventh Circuit· 2013-10-21· cited 90×
- Williams v. City of Chi.E.D. Illinois· 2018-06-01· cited 52×
- Morales v. ChadbourneFirst Circuit· 2015-07-17· cited 51×
- Jordan v. Town of WaldoboroFirst Circuit· 2019-11-27· cited 36×
- Pagan-Gonzalez v. MorenoFirst Circuit· 2019-03-22· cited 31×
- Cosenza v. City of WorcesterDistrict of Columbia· 2019-01-02· cited 21×
- Llovet v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2014-08-01· cited 21×
- Ciolino v. EastmanD. Massachusetts· 2015-09-03· cited 18×
- Damon v. HukowiczD. Massachusetts· 2013-08-09· cited 17×
- United States v. GrayFirst Circuit· 2015-03-13· cited 16×
- Morales v. ChadbourneD. Rhode Island· 2014-02-12· cited 11×
- Hernandez-Cuevas v. TaylorFirst Circuit· 2016-09-09· cited 8×
- Filler v. KellettFirst Circuit· 2017-06-15· cited 8×
- Diaz-Morales v. Rubio-ParedesD. Puerto Rico· 2016-03-21· cited 7×
- Camerano v. United StatesD. Massachusetts· 2016-07-07· cited 7×
- Schand v. City of SpringfieldDistrict of Columbia· 2019-05-06· cited 6×
- Charron v. County of YorkFirst Circuit· 2022-09-27· cited 6×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 15,294×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court· 1994-01-24· cited 7,028×
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court· 2007-02-21· cited 4,908×
- Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetFirst Circuit· 2011-04-01· cited 1,798×
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,546×
- Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2009-11-25· cited 1,312×
- Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-04-01· cited 1,048×
- Sykes v. AndersonSixth Circuit· 2010-11-09· cited 670×
- Manganiello v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2010-07-23· cited 615×
- Rodriguez-Reyes v. Molina-RodriguezFirst Circuit· 2013-03-22· cited 558×
- Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Desiderio Cartagena and Domingo Alvarez, Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Pedro N. Soto and Edwin F. GotayFirst Circuit· 1989-08-17· cited 552×
- Grider v. City of Auburn, Ala.Eleventh Circuit· 2010-09-07· cited 480×
- David Evans v. Patrick BakerFourth Circuit· 2012-12-17· cited 428×
- Pierce v. GilchristTenth Circuit· 2004-03-02· cited 358×
- Castellano v. FragozoFifth Circuit· 2003-12-05· cited 341×
- Sanchez v. Pereira-CastilloFirst Circuit· 2009-12-23· cited 326×
- Young v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.First Circuit· 2013-05-21· cited 314×
Other cases named Hernandez-Cuevas v. Taylor
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.