Hermreck v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where an employment contract is present, there does not exist any necessity for invoking a separate action for the tort of retaliatory discharge as to vindicate public policy.”
• “Where an employment contract is present, there does not exist any necessity for invoking a separate action for the tort of retaliatory discharge as to vindicate public policy.”
• “[W]hen another remedy exists to redress the violation of social policy that resulted in the employee’s discharge, then no need exists for a court imposed separate 13 tort action premised on the violation of public policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).